Best design:
Tanya Lee (Leiden University)
Advancing the movement of Open Research Information in the era of Platform Capitalism
Tanya Lee’s poster features a deep sea diver’s journey into open science, navigating dangers like a dangerously tentacled octopus. The poster explores the tension between movements seeking to reform science, like the open research information movement, and the continued dominance of proprietary platforms throughout the research lifecycle, Tanya explains. She hopes that visitors have taken away the importance of research information in today’s era of platform capitalism. ‘Proprietary platforms benefit greatly from positioning themselves at the intersection where researchers and research information meet. The open science movement must go beyond openness and continue to advocate for responsible and inclusive uses of research information, particularly when used to assess researchers and their research.’
Asked why she thinks her poster design impressed voters she answers. ‘Posters are your chance to be bold and creative. This goes beyond summarising your ideas, papers, or your results. Do not hesitate to experiment with the design, the colours, and the layouts. Consider thinking of your poster as a story to be told. Creative metaphors, like a giant octopus lurking in the deep ocean, can draw people in and deliver your message more effectively.’
View Tanya’s poster on Zenodo
Most impact:
Astrid van Wesenbeeck (KB, the National Library of the Netherlands)
Readers of your paper in society
Astrid van Wesenbeeck’s poster focused on WijsNL, an initiative by the KB to improve the accessibility of open access research for so-called new users of scholarly research. These are readers outside academia, such as teachers, healthcare professionals, journalists, policymakers, and citizen scientists. While open access removes paywalls, she highlighted that understandability remains a major barrier. By engaging researchers at the festival, her team sought input on how to make scholarly papers more approachable. ‘Imagine what it will be like if citizens of all kinds can access scholarly research in a way that fits their needs,’ she explains. ‘For some the open access paper will be enough but for many folks, an extra effort is desirable. Think about a layman’s abstract, the possibility to get in contact with the author, or related publications about the research that have been written for non-academics.’
Most innovative:
Shuai Wang (Maastricht University)
Designing Data Infrastructure Maturity Profiles
Shuai’s poster introduces a new framework for documenting implementation decisions related to resource use and service selection, offering a structured approach for comparing data infrastructures and monitoring their development. In addition, this initiative included two use cases, drawn from current projects at Maastricht University: PURE3D, a major data infrastructure, and UM's University Library Digital Collections Portal. Together, these use cases illustrate the versatility and potential of the DIMP framework in supporting data infrastructures of varying purposes and characteristics.
With the poster, Shuai wanted to get feedback about the innovative framework. ‘We hope that people think of DIMP for data infrastructures as DMP for datasets, and SMP for software.’ He admits he was surprised to win the ‘most innovative’ award because there were not many data infrastructure developers or managers in the audience, but happily received the recognition during the closing ceremony.
View Shuai’s poster on Zenodo
